U. S. Steel Home       

Search | Site Feedback | Careers | SteelTrack® | Automotive Home

 

Automotive Steel Technology | Commercial/Sales | Automotive Lab. | What's New
Steel vs. Aluminum | Publications | Luge Project | References | Contact Us | Site Map 

 


 

Steel vs. Aluminum: Crashworthiness

Current generation (in-production) front rail profile made from HSLA GR350 Steel compared to an aluminum extruded front rail profile from the a 2003 Honda Insight. Corresponding optimized hydroformed steel profiles proposed are shown on the left, which will have nearly identical performance in terms of crash energy management at nearly identical weight.

Today, more than ever, safety sells cars. For car buyers it is a key element of their purchasing decision. It's essential that consumers obtain reliable and accurate comparative information regarding the safety performance of individual car models.

The same crash standards must be met by steel intensive and aluminum intensive vehicles.  Steel offers the best solution for:

  • Maximum energy absorption at mixed failure modes
  • Energy absorption in bending and axial collapse
  • Positive strain rate sensitivity

Based on this U.S. Steel Product Technologies undertook a study to compare the crush performance of the current Honda Insight front aluminum extruded rail to an advanced high strength steel alternative, based on the identical design space and test conditions.  Both rail designs tested utilize a hexagon profile at 3.5” in diameter.  However the aluminum extrusion possesses a six-sided web structure in the interior, while the TRIP 780 1.3 mm steel version was a hydroformed design produced from a round tube into a hexagon profile.  Weight wise, there is a 10% differential.

Both numerical and experimental studies were carried out at U.S. Steel to compare the performance between the 1.3 mm TRIP 780 hexagon profile to the Honda Insight aluminum extrusion profile.  As shown in the figures bellow, the TRIP 780 hexagon profile proved almost identical performance to that of the 6XXX-T5 aluminum extrusion in terms of crash energy performance.  Again, both parts are nearly identical in weight.

This example exhibits the potential for the new steel grades being developed at United States Steel for similar weight savings at a much lower cost than aluminum use.


(click for larger picture)

Example of Real Life Frontal Crash Testing (440 KB)  DownloadPlayer

Back | Top | Next

 
 

Visit these non-automotive links on our corporate website:
Search     Site Map     Media     Contacts     What's New     Steel Links

 

Copyright 2005 United States Steel Corporation.  All rights reserved.
Site feedback to Webmaster.
Please see our Legal Notice for conditions regarding the use of this site 
and links provided to third-party web sites.
Trademarks and Ownership
Viewed best using IE v 4.0+ and Netscape v 4.0+ using 800 x 600 resolution.
Last Updated: