|
Steel
vs. Aluminum:
Aluminum Intensive Design
2002 Acura NSX:
Unit Body Aluminum Intensive Design
Disadvantages to this approach:
-
Formability of aluminum is poor in conventional stamping methods (high scrap rate expectancy).
- Recycling problems associated with 5xxx and 6xxx series
segregation, causing a wider variation in scrap revenues mixing
alloys compared to steel grades.
- There is a cost penalty
associated with using aluminum compared to steel of comparable
strength and part performance characteristics.
-
Insurance premium increase along with costly repairability in the field
(see repairability section).
-
Questionable dynamic performance increase in vehicle handling and fuel economy by this intensive use of
aluminum based on case studies of comparable steel intensive vehicles (see High Performance section).
- In most cases,
little or no increase in fuel economy results from intensive use
of aluminum (see High Performance section).
- Currently, there are
larger design lead times for tooling development with aluminum
than for steel parts, including higher tooling development
costs. This is mainly due to the knowledge and experience
base available for steel design and utilization. Also, the
difference in springback characteristics and less total elongation
for aluminum make designing for manufacturability more difficult.
 
Body-in-white and
closure breakdown pictorial of the 2002 NSX.
2002 Audi A8:
Space Frame Aluminum Intensive
Disadvantages to this approach:
- An increased level of
skilled labor is required for space frame construction, since the
joining methods are more complicated that the conventional stamping
method, based on data for the 2002 model year Audi A8. Most space frame vehicles on the market use fusion
welding to join the extrusions to stampings or castings.
Fusion welding requires specialized operators to ensure good welds
are made. The new 2004 Audi A8 is said to have fixed some of
these issues with use of laser welding and more automated processes.
- Due to part
variability, the extrusions must be manually positioned in the
assembly fixtures for the A8 through the 2002 model year. The
newest generation A8 is said to have resolved some of these issues
by use of hydroforming for improving dimensional tolerance, but this
added procedure may prove cost prohibitive for Audi since it is a
separate added process.
- Aluminum extrusion use
requires secondary operations such as cutting, bending, and
hydroforming, which can drive up assembly costs considerably, since
these processes are separate. Steel also requires secondary
operations but are performed in-line and in-sequence during the
stamping operations.

Body-in-white and
closure breakdown pictorial of the 2002 Audi A8.
Back
|
Top
|
Next
|